Black Hole Eats One Star, the Remains Pummel a Second One

 

   From- Sky &Telescope

   By - Monica Young

   Edited by - Amal Udawatta

This artist’s illustration shows a disk of material (red, orange, and yellow) created after a supermassive black hole (depicted on the right) destroyed a star through intense tidal forces. After a few years, this disk expanded outward until it began intersecting another orbiting object — either a star or a small black hole — around the giant black hole.
NASA / CXC / SAO and Soheb Mandhai / The Astro Phoenix

In 2019 a supermassive black hole ate a star. It’s incredible that such an incredible event is now commonplace — not in individual galaxies, where such stellar meals happen only every 10,000 to 100,000 years, but in our telescopes, through which astronomers can monitor millions of galaxies to observe their feeding habits.

    The crumbs of a supermassive black hole’s stellar meal has revealed the presence of a second star in a close orbit.

But in the course of studying this particular stellar feast, Matt Nicholl (Queen’s University Belfast, UK) and colleagues discovered something else: bright spikes of X-rays that recurred roughly every 48 hours. Those kinds of spikes have been observed elsewhere, and astronomers call them quasi-periodic emissions — a vague term that reflects the fact that we don’t know why they happen.

Now, they have an important clue. The Zwicky Transient Facility, a wide field-of-view camera that scans the whole sky every two days, found a visible flash of light that it dubbed AT2019qiz on September 19, 2019. That burst came from the center of a barred spiral galaxy some 210 million years ago, taking that long to travel to Earth. The flare marked the end of a star that had passed too close to that galaxy’s million-solar-mass black hole, and it was sheared apart in the extreme gravitational field.

These images from Pan-STARRS show the area around the event dubbed AT2019qiz, which represented the shredding of a star by the supermassive black hole at the center of the barred spiral galaxy pictured here.
PanSTARRS, NSF/Legacy Survey/SDSS

The black hole takes time to eat, and the stellar gas was still swirling inward as astronomers turned the Chandra X-ray Observatory to watch high-energy emission from the meal in 2023. They found an unexpected spike in X-ray emission that prompted follow-up observations with the Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER) onboard the International Space Station as well as observations from two other space telescopes, the Neil Gehrels Swift Telescope and India’s AstroSat.

In all, they found nine X-ray bursts that recurred roughly every two days. Hubble Space Telescope observations showed that the emissions are coming from a source less than 82 light-years across — in other words, too small to be a star cluster in the galaxy’s center. More likely, the source is material swirling around the black hole in an accretion disk.

This animation shows three frames of data from the Chandra X-ray Observatory, which found the first bright pulse of X-rays. The X-ray source at lower left is unrelated to the AT2019qiz system.
NASA / CXC / Queen's Univ. Belfast / M. Nicholl et al.; Image processing: NASA / CXC / SAO / N. Wolk

Nicholl’s team thinks these bursts mark the orbit of something crossing the accretion disk: another star.

“We don’t expect many stars orbiting this close to a black hole,” says Nicholl. “We think that most of the stars are sitting much further away, but every now and again they can deflect each other towards the black hole.”

If a single star were to fall toward the black hole, the strong gravity would shred it to pieces. But if a stellar pair falls in, three-body gravitational interactions mean that one star can be captured into orbit while its longtime companion is thrown out of the system altogether.

“These captures are rare,” Nicholl notes. But once bound to the black hole, the star stays there, its orbit only slowly decaying. “At any given time, a black hole at the center of an average galaxy will have about one star in a tight orbit like this.”

There’s no way for our telescopes to pick up the faint glow of a solo star so far away. But if, separately, another object falls into the black hole, its material spreads out into a disk and begins to interact with the captured star.

“However, this is just our simple picture,” Nicholl cautions. “Now that we think we know what to look for, we can observe what fraction of tidal disruption events have quasi-periodic oscillations, and this will let us actually measure how common these close orbiting stars really are, to test this theory.”

Time will tell, but they could be in luck: The fact that they found these repeating X-ray bursts by accident means they might be common in the universe at large.

“However, this is just our simple picture,” Nicholl cautions. “Now that we think we know what to look for, we can observe what fraction of tidal disruption events have quasi-periodic oscillations, and this will let us actually measure how common these close orbiting stars really are, to test this theory.”

Time will tell, but they could be in luck: The fact that they found these repeating X-ray bursts by accident means they might be common in the universe at large.