Skip to main content

THE JAMES WEBB SPACE TELESCOPE MAY HAVE SPOTTED A BABY GALAXY MERGER

 

.From  Sky & Telescope

 By - Arwen 

Faint, fuzzy dots among galaxies speckled on a black field
The massive gravity of galaxy cluster MACS0647 acts as a cosmic lens to bend and magnify light from the more distant MACS0647-JD system. It also triply lensed the JD system, causing its image to appear in three separate locations. These images, which are highlighted with white boxes, are marked JD1, JD2, and JD3; zoomed-in views are shown in the panels at right.
Science: NASA / ESA / CSA / Dan Coe (STScI) / Rebecca Larson (UT) / Yu-Yang Hsiao (JHU); Image processing: Alyssa Pagan (STScI)

New JWST images reveal that one of the most distant objects ever observed is actually two baby galaxies on a possible collision course

Big galaxies like the Milky Way — a spiral disk 100,000 light years across containing some 200 billion stars — are thought to come from the celestial meet-and-greets of the first galaxies, which were originally little more than tiny clumps of stars. Now, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has imaged two baby galaxies that existed just 430 million years after the Big Bang, each only hundreds of light-years across. Astronomers think they might be merging, shedding light on galaxy growth in the early universe.

“Most galaxies today will have been through several merger events,” says Tiger Yu-Yang Hsiao, (Johns Hopkins University), who led the study. “So [mergers] are key to studying the formation and evolution of galaxies today. Our target is from such an early time, right at the very beginning of this process. There is much we can learn from it.”

MACS0647–JD (MACS-JD) is an extremely distant object first observed about 10 years ago. At the time, it was considered to be the most distant galaxy ever observed, and it is still one of the earliest things we can study in detail with JWST.

Generally speaking, galaxies from the dawn of time are too faint and too far away to see. The reason we can see MACS-JD is because its light has been triply lensed, magnified and distorted by a massive galaxy cluster lying in front of it from our point of view. The cluster warps spacetime, splitting the light into three images of the same system. The images are magnified by factors of eight, five, and two, so they appear brighter than other galaxies at similar distances.

Hsiao’s JWST observations of MAC-JD verified previous conclusions about its distance, size, and physical properties — but with a surprising twist. What was once seen as a single object now appears to be two baby galaxies, labeled A and B. A is brighter and larger with very recent star formation and no dust, while B looks older and has a little bit of dust. Their differing star formation histories suggest they formed farther apart, only coming together recently.

“The researchers did a very good job approaching this problem, but there is a lot of uncertainty,” says Andrea Ferrara (Scuola Normale Superiore, Italy), who was not part of the study. He suggests that while a merger is a possibility, it’s also possible that one of the galaxies is a satellite of the other. Alternatively, the two components might be part of the same galaxy.

“We do expect that galaxies at this very high redshift are in the assembly process,” he notes, but he adds that additional data about the galaxies’ motions would help clarify their relationship.

Hsiao’s team based this study, posted on the arXiv and accepted to Astrophysical Journal Letters, solely on JWST images. Upcoming spectroscopic observations, also with JWST, should tell us how A and B are moving with respect to each other. If they are both part of the same galaxy, the difference between their velocities would be relatively small; if they are actually two merging galaxies, there would be a larger discrepancy. Besides shedding light on the objects’ motions, spectra will also tell us more about the chemical properties of these tiny, highly magnified galaxies observed in the early universe.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

New Comet SWAN Now Visible in Small Scopes

     From :- Sky & Telescope  By :- Bob King  Edited by :- Amal Udawatta This spectacular image of Comet SWAN (C/2025 F2) was taken on April 6th and shows a bright, condensed coma 5′ across and dual ion tails. The longer one extends for 2° in PA 298° and the other 30′ in PA 303°. Details: 11"/ 2.2 RASA and QHY600 camera. Michael Jaeger Amateur astronomers have done it again — discovered a comet. Not by looking through a telescope but through close study of  publicly released, low-resolution images  taken by the  Solar Wind Anisotropies  (SWAN) camera on the orbiting  Solar and Heliospheric Observatory  (SOHO). On March 29th, Vladimir Bezugly of Ukraine was the first to report a moving object in SWAN photos taken the week prior. Michael Mattiazzo of Victoria, Australia, independently found "a pretty obvious comet" the same day using the same images, noting that the object was about 11th magnitude and appeared to be brightening. R...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why did Homo sapiens outlast all other human species?

  From - Live Science By  Mindy Weisberger Edited by - Amal Udawatta Reproductions of skulls from a Neanderthal (left), Homo sapiens (middle) and Australopithecus afarensis (right)   (Image credit: WHPics, Paul Campbell, and Attie Gerber via Getty Images; collage by Marilyn Perkins) Modern humans ( Homo sapiens ) are the sole surviving representatives of the  human family tree , but we're the last sentence in an evolutionary story that began approximately 6 million years ago and spawned at least 18 species known collectively as hominins.  There were at least nine  Homo  species — including  H. sapiens  —  distributed around Africa, Europe and Asia by about 300,000 years ago, according to the Smithsonian's  National Museum of Nat ural History  in Washington, D.C. One by one, all except  H. sapiens  disappeared.  Neanderthals  and a  Homo  group known as the  Denisovans  lived alongside...
Post a Comment
Read more

Who Was the Real Marilyn Monroe?

  From - Smithsonian Magazine, By -  Grant Wong Historian, University of South Carolina, Edited by - Vinuri Randhula  Silva, “Blonde,” a heavily fictionalized film by Andrew Dominik, explores the star’s life and legend in a narrative that’s equal parts glamorous and disturbing Marilyn Monroe’s  final interview  is a heartbreaker. Published in  Life  magazine on August 3, 1962—just a day before the  actress died  of a barbiturate overdose at age 36—it found Monroe reflecting on her celebrity status, alternatively thoughtful, frank and witty. “When you’re famous you kind of run into human nature in a raw kind of way,” she observed. “It stirs up envy, fame does. People you run into feel that, well, who is she—who is she, who does she think she is, Marilyn Monroe?” That same question—who was the real Monroe?—has sparked debate among  cinema scholars ,  cultural critics ,  historians ,  novelists ,  filmmakers  and th...
Post a Comment
Read more