Skip to main content

THE AFTERMATH OF DART, HUMANKIND’S FIRST PLANETARY DEFENSE MISSION

 


From - Sky & Telescope,

 By Lauren Sgro  

Edited by -Amal Udawatta

Close-up view of Didymos and Dimorphos
This image, taken from 570 miles (920 kilometers) away shows the asteroid Didymos (bottom right) and its moonlet, Dimorphos, about 2.5 minutes before the impact of NASA’s DART spacecraft.
NASA / Johns Hopkins APL

Last year, NASA intentionally crashed the Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) into a nearby asteroid to test our ability to defend the Earth from rocky threats. The results are now in – the DART mission was a smashing success.

On September 26, 2022, DART hit its target asteroid Dimorphos, moon of the nearby asteroid 65803 Didymos, in a historic celestial experiment. Not only was DART the first planetary defense mission of its kind, but it marked the first time humanity was able to change the motion of a natural object in space. Initial estimations showed that Dimorphos’ orbit shortened by 32 minutes due to the impact, proving a successful deflection.

Now, five papers published March 1st in Nature detail more about the collision’s aftermath, from the mass of the dust jettisoned from Dimorphos’ surface to the momentum transferred from the impact.

DIMORPHOS SHIFTED WHEN DART HIT

A team led by Terik Daly (Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory) used ground-based radar observations and images from DART’s onboard camera to model the shape of Dimorphos and recreate the moment of impact. Using these data, they make the first estimate of Dimorphos’ density: 2,100 to 2,700 kg per cubic meter. That’s roughly half the density of Earth, indicating the moonlet’s rubble-pile nature.

Hubble images of blue tails of debris ejected from asteroid
These three panels capture the effects of the DART impact on Dimorphos.
Scence: NASA / ESA / STScI, Jian-Yang Li (PSI); Image processing: Joseph DePasquale (STScI)

In the same vein, a team led by Christine Thomas (Northern Arizona University) used visible-light and radar data to narrow down the change in Dimorphos’ orbital period around the larger Didymos to be 33 minutes, give or take 1 minute. Previous measurements had an uncertainty of 2 minutes, so this is the most precise measurement yet.

These characterizations of Dimorphos allowed Andrew Cheng (also at Johns Hopkins APL) and colleagues to simulate the change in Dimorphos’ velocity along its orbit. From these calculations, they assessed the momentum transferred to the unsuspecting asteroid during the collision.

Cheng’s team showed that the material knocked from Dimorphos’ surface during impact ended up transferring more momentum to Dimorphos than the DART spacecraft did by itself. Using LICIACube images, they find that the ejecta plume followed a direction nearly opposite and away from that of DARTs impact. That opposite reaction pumped more momentum into the system to bolster DART’s effect by 3.61 times, nudging Dimorphos into a new orbit.

“There were predictions of both high and low momentum transfer, so I can’t say I was very surprised, but I was expecting to see a lower momentum transfer [from the ejecta],” says Cheng, who is DART’s principal investigator.

CITIZEN SCIENTISTS CONTRIBUTE TO DART

Observers at large telescopes weren’t the only ones watching the DART impact. In a study led by Ariel Graykowski (SETI Institute), a light curve shows Dimorphos’ changes in brightness and color before, during, and after the impact — all made possible by the 31 citizen scientists who are listed as coauthors on the paper.

Man at telescope
SETI Institute researchers mobilized Unistellar citizen scientists to observe the impact, which was only visible from parts of Africa. This picture is from a nearby outreach session at a rural school in Nairobi, Kenya.
Susan Murabana

These observers, located across five continents, submitted data using their Unistellar eVscopes as part of Unistellar’s partnership with the SETI institute. Several of these avid skywatchers even caught the moment of impact.

Using the brightness measurements gathered by amateur astronomers, Graykowski’s team estimated the mass, speed, and energy of the ejecta. “Cheng and colleagues quantify exactly how much extra momentum the dusty ejecta must have transferred to the asteroid,” Graykowski says. “Our estimates from ground-based observations taken with small, 4.5-inch telescopes are in agreement.”

Graykowski and colleagues used the eVscope data to track the movement of the ejecta, and they calculated that the ejecta mass was only 0.3 to 0.5% of Dimorphos’ total mass. Despite the bright display of mass loss post-impact, this estimate confirms that the cosmic crash didn’t destroy Dimorphos.

Animation of DART impact
This series of images captures the DART impact, as observed by Bruno Payet from the Réunion Island on September 26, 2022.
SETI Institute

Although the collision was not destructive, Jiang-Yiang Li (Planetary Science Institute) and his collaboration find that it did turn Dimorphos into an active asteroid with a tail and coma — like a comet but without the sublimating ice. Previously, astronomers suspected that natural impacts could make asteroids active, but no one had observed such an impact directly. Dimorphos’ newfound activity confirms this idea and gives scientists a real-life laboratory to study how it works.

THE FUTURE OF PLANETARY DEFENSE

DART has made an impact on our understanding of asteroids and how we will guard Earth in the future, proving that we aren’t doomed to become the victims of a movie plot. Now that we have seen a kinematic impactor (that is, the DART mission) result in successful deflection, this method of planetary defense has moved from a theoretical possibility to a viable option to save our planet.   

We will learn more about the post-impact Didymos system with the European Space Agency’s Hera Mission. Scheduled to launch October 2024, Hera will characterize and probe the surface of Dimorphos upon its arrival in 2026. “Most important is that Hera will measure the mass of Dimorphos,” notes Cheng. “Hera will also measure the size of the DART crater and measure the deformation, if any, of Dimorphos. These are critical data to better determine the amount of ejecta.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Comet SWAN Now Visible in Small Scopes

     From :- Sky & Telescope  By :- Bob King  Edited by :- Amal Udawatta This spectacular image of Comet SWAN (C/2025 F2) was taken on April 6th and shows a bright, condensed coma 5′ across and dual ion tails. The longer one extends for 2° in PA 298° and the other 30′ in PA 303°. Details: 11"/ 2.2 RASA and QHY600 camera. Michael Jaeger Amateur astronomers have done it again — discovered a comet. Not by looking through a telescope but through close study of  publicly released, low-resolution images  taken by the  Solar Wind Anisotropies  (SWAN) camera on the orbiting  Solar and Heliospheric Observatory  (SOHO). On March 29th, Vladimir Bezugly of Ukraine was the first to report a moving object in SWAN photos taken the week prior. Michael Mattiazzo of Victoria, Australia, independently found "a pretty obvious comet" the same day using the same images, noting that the object was about 11th magnitude and appeared to be brightening. R...

Who Was the Real Marilyn Monroe?

  From - Smithsonian Magazine, By -  Grant Wong Historian, University of South Carolina, Edited by - Vinuri Randhula  Silva, “Blonde,” a heavily fictionalized film by Andrew Dominik, explores the star’s life and legend in a narrative that’s equal parts glamorous and disturbing Marilyn Monroe’s  final interview  is a heartbreaker. Published in  Life  magazine on August 3, 1962—just a day before the  actress died  of a barbiturate overdose at age 36—it found Monroe reflecting on her celebrity status, alternatively thoughtful, frank and witty. “When you’re famous you kind of run into human nature in a raw kind of way,” she observed. “It stirs up envy, fame does. People you run into feel that, well, who is she—who is she, who does she think she is, Marilyn Monroe?” That same question—who was the real Monroe?—has sparked debate among  cinema scholars ,  cultural critics ,  historians ,  novelists ,  filmmakers  and th...

Why did Homo sapiens outlast all other human species?

  From - Live Science By  Mindy Weisberger Edited by - Amal Udawatta Reproductions of skulls from a Neanderthal (left), Homo sapiens (middle) and Australopithecus afarensis (right)   (Image credit: WHPics, Paul Campbell, and Attie Gerber via Getty Images; collage by Marilyn Perkins) Modern humans ( Homo sapiens ) are the sole surviving representatives of the  human family tree , but we're the last sentence in an evolutionary story that began approximately 6 million years ago and spawned at least 18 species known collectively as hominins.  There were at least nine  Homo  species — including  H. sapiens  —  distributed around Africa, Europe and Asia by about 300,000 years ago, according to the Smithsonian's  National Museum of Nat ural History  in Washington, D.C. One by one, all except  H. sapiens  disappeared.  Neanderthals  and a  Homo  group known as the  Denisovans  lived alongside...