News at a glance: Earth science satellites, Global Fund’s haul, and Neptune’s rings

From -  Science News Staff (Science Magazine)

Edited by - Amal Udawatta,

European satellite duo will study oceans and warming

The European Space Agency (ESA) last week approved the $420 million Harmony mission as the next in its Earth Explorer line of science missions, following a competition. Harmony’s two satellites will carry infrared sensors and radar receivers to observe the turbulent waves, winds, and eddies that govern the interchange of heat and gases between the oceans and atmosphere. Scientists know oceans soak up more than 90% of the excess heat of global warming, but they need Harmony’s finer scale observations to explain how—and to calibrate climate models that predict the evolution of these dynamics decades ahead. “We want to study how the oceans and the atmosphere are talking to each other,” says principal investigator Paco López-Dekker, a remote sensing scientist at the Delft University of Technology. After launch in 2029, the Harmony satellites will fly in formation with one of ESA’s Sentinel-1 radar satellites, to be launched in 2025, while capturing its reflected beams at different angles. The mission will also be able to monitor 3D ground motions as small as 1 millimeter a year—of interest to scientists monitoring glacial ice loss, volcanic eruptions, and the seismic strain that leads to earthquakes.

FACILITIES

Fiona ruins Puerto Rico research

Scientists in Puerto Rico say they lost vital refrigerated samples and face delayed and ruined studies after Hurricane Fiona knocked out power across the island last week. The disruption continued this week, and authorities predict it may take workers weeks to restore a sustained power supply. Some researchers have transferred samples to other locations powered by generators. Ileana Rodríguez-Velez, a chemist at the University of Puerto Rico, Humacao, moved some still-viable samples of plants she is studying for their anticancer and antimicrobial activity to refrigerators at her and her mother’s houses. Many researchers also endured outages when Hurricane Marèa devastated the island in 2017. The restoration of the power grid has proceeded slowly, and after Fiona struck, some generators installed by researchers failed or lack enough fuel to operate reliably.

PUBLIC HEALTH

Donor absorbs pandemic institute

Eighteen months after vaccine specialist Rick Bright took the helm of a new institute with ambitious plans to help thwart future pandemics, he has left the job, and the young organization has been folded into the larger mission of its funder, the Rockefeller Foundation. During the administration of former President Donald Trump, Bright led a major U.S. funding agency that supports R&D for products to combat pandemics, but resigned from that job because of disagreements over the administration’s COVID-19 response. Questioned about Bright’s departure from the Pandemic Prevention Institute, a foundation spokesperson says, “The landscape has changed significantly” since its launch, “as there are now many different initiatives focused on creating a pandemic-free future.” These include ones led by the World Health Organization and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Rockefeller had pledged to invest $150 million over 3 years to support outside scientific efforts that do pathogen surveillance and establish a network to share data more efficiently. Bright says Rockefeller was pivoting to focus more on climate change. “I know their leadership and support in this area will make a huge impact,” he says.

FUNDING

Global disease fund nets top haul

High- and low-income countries alike last week joined in pledging $14.25 billion to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, in the largest single fundraising push for global health. Supporters said the sum was necessary to help reverse setbacks in combating those diseases caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, although the amount fell short of the Global Fund’s goal of $18 billion. The pledged amount may increase if Italy and the United Kingdom make contributions; changes this month in their governments delayed expected commitments. Many of the 45 countries that did pledge money, including low-income nations in Africa, upped their pledges by 30% or more despite inflation and other economic pressures. If achieved, the $18 billion could save 20 million lives and avoid 450 million new infections, the Global Fund estimates. The United States made the single largest commitment, up to $6 billion, but Congress must approve the money. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation made the largest private pledge, $912 million.

IN FOCUS

NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope has captured the clearest view of Neptune and its rings since the Voyager 2 probe briefly flew by in 1989. The new images, released last week, are the first recorded in infrared light—which explains why the planet does not appear blue, as it does in visible light. The gas giant’s high-altitude, methane-ice clouds appear as streaks and spots, NASA said. The image also shows seven of Neptune’s 14 known moons (not all of which are visible in the version above).NASA/ESA/CSA/STSCI

Honorary’ authors abound

Up to one-third of authors named on a large sample of scientific journal articles are “honorary” because they did not fulfill criteria for being listed as authors, a study has found. Some 1% of the authors provided only funding or other resources for the project, contributions that would not qualify a researcher for authorship under two standard definitions. The study, presented this month at the International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication, examined more than 629,000 authors on 82,000 papers published in the PLOS family of journals from 2017 to 2021. It was unusual because it examined standardized statements, submitted by corresponding authors, that described each author’s contribution. Previous studies have estimated the frequency of honorary authorship based on self-reports by scientists on surveys.

Many journals, one peer review

Cell Press this month adopted a new method of peer review under which scientists may submit a single manuscript for simultaneous consideration by up to 20 of its life and medical science journals. The Community Review program, the first of its kind by a large commercial publisher of high-profile journals, is intended to reduce the effort spent by authors and reviewers when papers rejected by one journal are resubmitted to others. In a trial of the new approach, editors identified which journals could be a match for a paper; the author could then choose to advance the manuscript to peer review or to withdraw it and submit it to a non–Cell Press journal. Authors withdrew some 40% of papers, apparently because they hoped for publication in a more elite Cell Press journal, said Cell Press’s Sejal Vyas this month at the International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication. Overall, the shares of manuscripts advancing to peer review (33%) and accepted for publication (21%) were comparable to those of regular submissions to Cell Press’s individual journals.